<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Career on Some Guys Blog</title><link>https://someguys.blog/tags/career/</link><description>Recent content in Career on Some Guys Blog</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:25:39 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://someguys.blog/tags/career/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Twenty years in infrastructure, and the work doesn't look the same anymore</title><link>https://someguys.blog/posts/2026-05-12-twenty-years-in-infrastructure/</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://someguys.blog/posts/2026-05-12-twenty-years-in-infrastructure/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;For the past couple of months I&amp;rsquo;ve been asking myself whether twenty years of experience still counts for anything, and how I&amp;rsquo;m supposed to describe my work on LinkedIn if AI is doing all the work. The engineers who don&amp;rsquo;t use AI aren&amp;rsquo;t helping. The ones who refuse to aren&amp;rsquo;t either. &amp;ldquo;Ask your robot friend.&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;Is this AI slop?&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;Looks vibe coded.&amp;rdquo; Each one is a way of saying the work doesn&amp;rsquo;t count because of how it got done. The shade is loud. The doubt is mine. So this post is me writing my way to an answer.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>